Re: (TFT) Ambiguities related to forcing retreat (for wiki)

[Lloyd Weber <laweber3@yahoo.com>]

I was just thinking, maybe it should be the attacker who did the most damage
gets first choice where to retreate the defender...just an idea.

-----
Original Message ----
From: Rick Smith <rsmith@lightspeed.ca>
To:
tft@brainiac.com
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 6:18:14 PM
Subject: Re:
(TFT) Ambiguities related to forcing retreat (for wiki)

Hi Everyone,

Ah,
sorry, I missed that.

We do retreats in DX order of the people who get to
retreat others.  A
figure can only be retreated once so Abel gets to retreat
Charlie. 
Baker is out of luck.

Rick

On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 16:15, Todd
Roseberry wrote:
> Rick,
> 
> The question arises when Abel and Baker both
attack Charlie. They both do 
> damage to Charlie but neither take damage
themselves. When is Charlie forced 
> to retreat, when he attempts an attack
and fails to do damage (which could 
> before Baker even attacks) or at the
end of the "turn" after Baker has 
> attackd and hit? If Charlie's failed
attack occurs after Abel and Baker have 
> both attacked, who determines (Abel
or Baker) when and where he treats?
> 
> I think this was the question.
> 
>
Aidan
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"
_____________________________________________________________________________
_______
Sponsored Link

Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. 
$420k for $1,399/mo.
Calculate new payment! 
www.LowerMyBills.com/lre
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"