RE: (TFT) Force Retreat

["Matt Picone" <matman@mysticworks.com>]

Interesting point about the jab... I could easily argue for either side.

...Hyperextension vs. Constant Threat...


-- 
</M@>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tft-owner@brainiac.com [mailto:tft-owner@brainiac.com] 
> On Behalf Of Stan
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:57 PM
> To: tft@brainiac.com
> Subject: Re: (TFT) Force Retreat
> 
> 
> Matt Picone wrote:
> > If someone is "force retreated" into a hex that not 
> adjacent to their 
> > attacker's, do the parties disengage?
> 
> Yes.  Or rather, engagement status is determined at the start 
> of each turn, how you got there is irrelevent.  Certainly the 
> fact that you're 'breaking the engagement' doesn't prohibit a 
> forced retreat such as you describe.
> 
> One thing...does anyone play it such that a polearm user 
> engages people within reach of it's jab?  I don't think the 
> rules meant for that to be the case, but wondered if anyone 
> plays it that way. ===== Post to the entire list by writing 
> to tft@brainiac.com. Unsubscribe by mailing to 
> majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body "unsubscribe tft"
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"