(TFT) Re: Purity of the Rules

[Mark Tapley <mtapley@swri.edu>]

At 21:47 -0500 11/13/06, David wrote:
> Just for fun I would like to run an informal poll here. Please respond
> to only one:
>
> 1. Our group plays TFT by the book with no alterations.
>
> 2. Our group plays TFT with only one or two (minor at best) house rules.
>
> 3. Our group plays TFT with several GM invented house rules.
>
> 4. Our group plays TFT in name only, the rules have been so altered
> that you would barely recognize them.
>
> My vote falls into number 2.

Pretty much Category 1 so far, exceptions only where there's an 
out-and-out missing chunk in the rules or where (as in this case) 
there's ambiguity between different editions/books.

> Bonus poll:
>
> 1. I believe the Fantasy Master's Screen and the Codex should be
> considered part of the official cannon.
>
> 2. I do not believe the Fantasy Master's Screen and the Codex should be
> considered part of the official cannon.
>
> I'm voting for number 2.

2 from me as well.

> - --David O. Miller

--
                           Mark Tapley, Dwarf Engineer
                       (I haven't cleared my neighborhood)
                 210-379-4635 Dwarf Phone, 210-522-6025 Office Phone
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"