[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (TFT) "Average" characters
In a message dated 6/25/2007 10:11:11 AM Central Daylight Time,
> I wanted to get some opinions on "starting" characters.
> For humans, the starting player character is 32 points. But in the rules it
> states that a 10 for an attribute represents the 'average' for a human. So
> that means that the typical villager or peasant will be ST=10, DX=10, IQ=10.
> (It would also follow that since there are so many high attribute characters
> in adventures, that a typical peasant may be closer to ST=9, DX=9, IQ=9).
Except that characters in adventures are going to be a tiny fraction of the
population. Certainly less than 5%, probably less than 0.5%, possibly less than
> But every published TFT supplement that I have been able to read, has ALL
> the (human) characters and opponents as at 32 point characters. Should this be
> so? Shouldn't a large part of the population consist of 30 point
> characters? Or is the assumption that all the 30 point characters choose safe, boring
> town jobs, and that only the 'above average' characters would get accepted
> into the army, guard duty, or whatever the player characters are going to face?
> Opinions? Comments?
Does a 10 represent an average attribute for an *adult* human, or for *all*
humans including children?
10 months in a 5/16 job - e.g. a Recruit in the Army/Police/Mercenaries
should give two "good" rolls on average, increasing a 30 point character to 32
points. So it's plausable that the NPCs in the army, on guard duty, etc. will be a
couple of points better than average, even if they're average 30 pointers
when they join. And then after a year they'll be Regulars, with a 4/17 risk roll
- and thus slower improvement.
what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Post to the entire list by writing to email@example.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to firstname.lastname@example.org with the message body