Re: Change (was: (TFT) Jobs table: ...)

[Joey Beutel <mejobo@comcast.net>]

should be noted: I have no problem with magic as a science, its just  
that one has to explain it much better that way, I find (if players  
research it, that is).
On Sep 30, 2011, at 4:27 PM, raito@raito.com wrote:

> Also, part of the reason to equate magic-as-in-spells with  
> engineering is that casting a spell you know is not research/ 
> science. You know how it's supposed to turn out. This does not mean  
> that there can't be magical research. It would be much as scientific  
> research. You're looking for principles that you can use, or you're  
> looking for something new that you can reproduce. Magically, if you  
> can reproduce it, it's a spell.
> And if you're looking for the various bases for magic, a good start  
> might be Lyndon Hardy's The Master Of Five Magics.
> Neil Gilmore
> raito@raito.com
> =====
> Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
> Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
> "unsubscribe tft"
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"