Re: (TFT) Re: TFT Digest V4 #225

[Jay Carlisle <maou.tsaou@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Dan Tulloh wrote:
> Radiation probably increases exponentially as you approach the galactic
> center, as does the possibility of getting caught in a supernova, etc. B  So
> it probably makes sense that you'd find more life in the outer arms than in
> towards the center.
>

Hummm... good point perhaps Dan.
My thoughts are that this kind of thing mainly hinges on how the
technology works.
Here's a nice consolidation of various space travel "techs" from
fiction and speculation.
http://www.projectrho.com/stardrv.txt
I throw in a little red mercury for system drives and a bit of
unobtainium for warp drives.
Associating the resources with Pop II stars would make the galactic
center more attractive.

I hear you too Peter and agree.
My off the cuff thought probably isn't in the "flavor" of Star Trek.
I note however that Star Trek wasn't what I'd call well conceptualized
to start with.
I don't mean it was a bad programe, rather I mean they didn't plan on
"franchise" status and left a lot of those type of issues mostly
unaddressed.
"Wagon Train to the stars" didn't really need star maps of galactic
empires or detailed descriptions of advanced technologies.
As a matter of fact such information in that style is probably a bad idea.
Much like playing a series of D&D modules Star Trek wasn't so
interested in the logistics and the actual travel.
That's fair enough.
But then it got iconic, or whatever you want to call it.
A significant portion of detail and background were added after the
thing was already "running".
I'm not knocking that, but note it's not "ideal" from a design pov.
Also, Star Trek Voyager (my fav Captain) was only out about 20
kiloparsecs according to the site to start the "long voyage home".
The plane of the Milky Way is around 30 kiloparsecs in diameter.
Even by the Star Trek info these guys aren't flitting about the whole
of the galaxy at whim.
Call it 700 kiloparsecs for the galactic plane area and about 175
kiloparsecs per "quadrant" in area.
We're already about 10 kps out from center and Kirks Enterprise was an
older ship than Voyager so I'd still reckon the mission was pointed
inward rather than out.
But again, for all I know there's an "official" rout for the original
series nowadays.
I'm not saying I'm right, just that I feel little though was given to
the actual direction the thing went off in when it first left and why.
IMO you head for density.
If Janeway has the journey of a lifetime to get home from 20 kps then
heading toward galactic center doesn't mean actually trying to reach
galactic center.

I really dig the analogy you mention twixt warp ships and english
ships of the line during the age of sail in total sustainable numbers.
Is that official Trek mythos?
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"