Re: Howard Thompson charge attack

Regardless, you all have to admit that it clearly illustrates some of the problems with HT's Charge Attack rule...

From: PvK <pvk@oz.net>
To: tft@brainiac.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 8:30 AM
Subject: Re: Howard Thompson charge attack

I think it's an optional rule where a rifle-user can trade adjDX for accuracy to gain adjDX for rate of fire, which didn't pay off.

--- tfulmer1@gmail.com wrote:

From: Thomas Fulmer <tfulmer1@gmail.com>
To: tft@brainiac.com
Subject: Re: Howard Thompson charge attack
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:10:12 +0000

Cris has a valid point, the charge attach should have happened first. This
clearly is using some non-Howard Thompson rule set

;-)

--Thomas

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 3:21 PM Cris Fuhrman <fuhrmanator@gmail.com> wrote:

> But... but... the defender took at least two (really bad) shots at the guy
> charging before he pulled it off.
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:12 AM, David O. Miller <
> davidomiller@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> Now that was hysterical. Exactly what I want to avoid when messing around
> with the charge attack rules.
>
> Thanks for sharing it! Made my morning.
>
> David
> __________________________________________
> David O. Miller
> *Miller Design/Illustration*
> www.davidomiller.com
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 14, 2016, at 7:59 PM, Peter von Kleinsmid <pvk@oz.net> wrote:
>
> The Howard Thompson charge attack has made it to 21st Century video games:
>
> http://imgur.com/gallery/F2opeto
>
> ;-)
>
> =====
> Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
> Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
> "unsubscribe tft"
>
>
>
>

=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"