[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (TFT) Who owns ideas?
On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, J. McGuire wrote:
> IMO, the fact that one had a creative ancestor shouldn't automatically
> give one the rights to sit back and live off of the rewards of that
> ancestor's work, especially when that means denying the benefit of
> that work to the rest of the world.
In principle, I agree with this. Realistically speaking, however, this
can turn into a complex issue very easily. What if the creative person
dies suddenly without leaving a will? What if they were running a
business which depended upon their creations? Suppose the creator had
young children? Does the fact that the creator died without a will mean
that those children should be left without means. One can get wrapped
around the axle in a hurry with these topics.
> >A number of authors have sued successfully based on movies being
> >created that (according to the authors) were based on *ideas* from
> >their books. Under strict copyright law, *ideas" cannot be copy-
> >righted, but these suits have been upheld. (Harlan Ellison has won
> >a couple...)
As you desribe, Ideas cannot be copyrighted - but the *expression* of
the idea can be. This is probably what the suits were based on.
> Y'know, there is a way around this, at least for the honorable individual
> author. I think I should put it in my will: "To the Public Domain, for the
> perpetual use and enjoyment thereof, I irrevocably grant the rights to all
> of my creative works, excepting only those for which I filed copyright in
> the ten years prior to my death. The latter shall be given to the Public
> Domain in perpetuity on the tenth anniversary of my death."
This is not a bad idea. :)
Post to the entire list by writing to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Unsubscribe by mailing to email@example.com with the message body