Re: Re[2]: (TFT) New Spell: Flesh Flesh

[Dan Tulloh <dwtulloh@zianet.com>]

At 09:43 AM 1/5/01 -0500, you wrote:
>>> The FLESH FLESH spell discussed before is not really needed 
>>> as there is already a spell (REMOVE THROWN SPELL (AW)) which 
>>> performs the same function. 
>>   
>>....but I thought FLESH FLESH would work on ordinary, non 
>> magic natural protection such as fur and "what have we 
>> not's" ?
>
>Yes that was rather the point.  It would also work on 
>people using the infamous 0fSt Stone Flesh rings, 
>something that I believe remove thrown spell would not
>affect. 

I'd forgotten about that.  But a FLESH FLESH spell would 
remove all of that that protection, which makes it a 
rather powerful spell.  I rather prefer the idea of a 
spell like BUTTER FLESH above, which works to enhance 
the damage received.  If you wanted, you could allow
BUTTER FLESH to be a spell which is dependent upon the
number of ST put into it.  For example, for a cost of 
8ST and 2 per turn to maintain, you could double the 
effect (adding 4 to damage, etc).

Dan



=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"