[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (TFT) TFT Healing
Some random thoughts:
o In a group with related but variant interests, it's human nature to see
ones own preference as the beleagered minority. So I see my preference for
low-lethality, high fantasy play as a beleagered minority amid a sea of fans who
[heart] TFT for its high lethality and lack of healing. And (I guess) the
low-healing fans often feel like a beleagered minority among those who want
lots-of-magical-D&D-style healing. It's perception that matters here, no matter what
the reality may be.
o To what extent are the people here *players* in TFT games, as opposed to
being TFT GMs? I've noticed that a tendency toward "GMitis" among gamers: What's
fun and cool for GMs to run is often not-so-fun from the player's POV, and
what fun and cool for players will often tend to give GMs heartburn. Often this
is just a matter of degree - players having much more (or much less) tolerance
for certain situations and kinds of play than the GM. But it's an important
matter of degree.
In online fora like this one, it tends to be mostly GMs who gather and so the
GM POV gets over-represented and reinforced. And the players' POV gets
belittled and dismissed because there's hardly anyone to defend it.
I try to watch out for GMitis in myself, but I have been caught out. And
since the players who caught me out are experienced GMs with their own games
(albeit not TFT games) I couldn't just dismiss their complaints as munchkin
whining. Even worse (or rather better, in the end) I had to conclude, after
considering things from their POV, that they were *right*, darn it. (This is where my
decision to boost healing potions to 1d+1 from 1 pt came, in fact.)
o I find that high lethality interferes with roleplaying. And since
roleplaying is a big part of the fun, that makes high lethality a problem for me.
The way I see it, when a PC of mine is injured to the point where one unlucky
(from his POV) roll can kill him, it's time (if not past time) to withdraw
and recover. If he can't withdraw and recover, then he's screwed up on the
strategic level. And if not being able to withdraw & recover keeps happening over
and over, then I'm dealing with a Sadastic Bastard Killer GM, and I am unable
to continue to roleplay my PC. (If I do try to roleplay the PC the result will
be "the PC goes mad, in an unfun and possibly game-destructive way.") (Query
for GMs here who use disads: What is the value of "Delusion: I am dead. This
is no longer the real world. I am in Hell, where I am being put through a
particularly subtle and nasty torment by a powerful evil demon."?)
Similarly, if I'm in a high-lethality game where one bad roll can kill my PC
right out of the gate, then I can only view my PC as being bugshit crazy to
even CONSIDER an adventuring career. And I have a limited ability to roleplay
such bugshit crazy characters. If it's the only gaming available, then what I
tend to do is not roleplay the PC but just treat him as a token.
o OTOH, I can understand playing in a high-lethality, low-healing campaign as
giving the thrill of juggling eggs ("One oops, and it's broken! That's the
thrill! That's the fun!"). Even though I don't share that taste at all.
o Rapid healing cuts down on lethality, but it's best not to put too much
strain on it as the only means of doing so. It's better to combine it with
optional rules that let PCs *take* less damage in the first place. The classic way
to do this is with inflated hit points - highly able characters have more hit
points and so take (proportionately) less damage when hit with a given attack.
But this method has its own problems. For my own TFT game I've settled on an
active defense roll for skilled combatants (i.e. those with the Fencing talent)
and sucked up the extra overhead this adds to gameplay. (I've also replaced
Warrior and Veteran with a new "Toughness" talent.)
o Something that I've never seen any game system do a good job of emulating
is the character with the "crazed weasel defense." This is the character with
little or no armor, who jumps a bunch of low-skill opponents armed with weapons
that *would* hurt badly if they connect, and then jumps around like a crazed
weasel in such a way that - somehow - he never gets hit. (Or at worst he gets
hit very very rarely - a grazing wound once every 10 to 100 fights).
Archtypes of this sort of thing would be Spiderman or Batman dealing with a
bunch of low-life gang members armed with handguns. They are always shown using
the "crazed weasel" defence, in contrast to more bulletproof superheroes who
let the bullets bounce off their chests.
o Rapid healing isn't necessarily *instant* healing, and there's a good case
for keeping healing from being instant even if it is rapid. I have healing
potions "convert" regular injury into fatigue loss/stun damage rather than just
being a "poof, you're healed" effect. I'm thinking of also applying this to
physicker healing. The "Life" spell or potion will still be a "ShaBoom! You're
Healed!" effect that (if you're alive) completely heals all injury, stun, &
fatigue - but it *is* the ultimate healing spell in my campaign, able to bring
back the (recently) dead.
Erol K. Bayburt
Evil Genius for a Better Tomorrow
Post to the entire list by writing to email@example.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to firstname.lastname@example.org with the message body