[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: (TFT) Re: TFT Digest V3 #880



Hmmm, that seems be the consensus. I will check it out. Thank you, all, for your responses !

-- John



From: Sethkimmel@aol.com
Reply-To: tft@brainiac.com
To: tft@brainiac.com
Subject: (TFT) Re: TFT Digest V3 #880
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:43:47 EST

In a message dated 2/14/07 1:13:40 AM !!!First Boot!!!,
tft-owner@brainiac.com writes:


> Interesting. It makes me want to research "C&S" ("Chivalry and Sorcery").
>
> I never played it. Does anyone have any comments on it as a gaming system?
>

IMNSHO (and I used to be a friend of Scott Bizar's when FGU was still around
on Long Island so I don't consider myself biased against it...) it's the
FINEST database of Medieval and Feudal economics I've ever seen short of a Doctoral
dissertation. It's also not too shabby as far as teaching the culture of
Medieval and Feudal Europe. It also has a HUGE magical database covering most "historical" magic (i.e., it described and tried to quantify all European magic from myth and literature). That being said it sucks wind as a PLAYABLE system. It is a nightmare of detail and "realism." I DO recommend that everybody pick them up for the info and use another RPG system (I wonder if anyone can think of one...:-)?) to game out the situations. It is WAY to far over on the realism
side of the "realism Vs playability" scale.
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"