Re: (TFT) Re: Building; square megahex

["Jay Carlisle" <selfinflicted_wounds@boardermail.com>]

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: pvk@oz.net

> > More importantly, on a megahex basis
> > (for example, for Missile Weaps or Spells), it returns us to the
> > original problem with squares, that is, you can shoot 41% further in a
> > diagonal direction on a square grid than you can at the 90 degree
> > angles.
> ...
> 
> Make a ruler and mark it off with the straight range and/or DX penalty.
> It's even faster to use than counting hexes, and is even more accurate
> than using a hex grid to determine range.
> 
> PvK



PLEASE! PLEASE! Don't say this....


Else if we are at 'Barker Rules' and, well.....

No problem w/movement @ any angle.

I'd like to use "Celular Automa" i.e. "A New Kind Of Sicence" to handel alot of downtime.

Who reads Rudy Rucker?



http://www.spsu.edu/math/tile/aperiodic/index.htm


What makes me cry happily is the fact that Mr. B thinks ALOT the same...

Maybe I ain't crazy...

LOL!

GREAT MINDS and whatnot....


Jay




-- 
_______________________________________________
Get your free email from http://www.boardermail.com
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"