[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (TFT) Story - industrial staticism
In a message dated 2/11/2008 1:09:09 PM Central Standard Time,
> First, by considering ways in which a Player may attempt to create such
> "things" a GM can design the Campaign in such a way as to block thoses type
> A simpel method of acomplishing this is to set the Population of the region
> at a minimum level for sustance.
> No work force, no Mega-project.
> Look what the Egyptians did with no Magic or Tech, just one hella-large
Yes, considering these things allows a GM to design his campaign in such a
way as to block these types of projects. However, I am very skeptical about the
idea of blocking such projects by setting the population low. The population
has to be set *really* low in order to make this work. Consider how a
sparsely-populated Britian managed to build Stonehenge.
Setting the population low enough to block undesired projects also tends to
block the desired stuff as well. IMO it's even more effective at blocking the
desired stuff. A lot of the "industiral" projects are labor-saving projects,
clever ways of doing things that substitute magic for a workforce. Suppressing
this by reducing the population of the game world requires taking things to the
point where ordinary PCs dissappear in a puff of logic.
Better to tweak the rules so that industial-style magic either isn't cost
effective or isn't possible. Either: "No, Gates don't work that way in this
campaign." Or "Yes, magic can be used to build a pyramid, or a cathedral, or a
stonehenge, or to take an enemy castle. But it's cheaper to hire a bunch of
mundane laborers or mercenaries to do the task." Or better yet, a combination of the
The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy
Awards. Go to AOL Music.
Post to the entire list by writing to email@example.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to firstname.lastname@example.org with the message body