[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (TFT) Bringing Melee Wizard into the 3rd Dimension
- To: tft@brainiac.com
- Subject: Re: (TFT) Bringing Melee Wizard into the 3rd Dimension
- From: Sgt Hulka <hulkasgt@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:36:23 -0800 (PST)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1235180183; bh=4k3XUveCE/2gPHcg11ja60uAiD3bCV0jzjI/SDQaYuw=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eEIYJEUlDjw+bWWICMjzPLLx6L0iw/wbbcypXiWY7bb1wY5jur5wyESwBRb/P2jiVu4PXHmNUhQijwkxNp6UtNl/hN4Dc/TZIrL2BGtwY02+n8h1RmZyXiZ6CpwKOaOS2aQBB2scoaK/5qRs7YclSB6KccbQ7/YJ4kBMNOa/NHE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=5ASMrLvKBirh3j1n4qDmjWZyIzOlhQBExTdfhwMWfJEJgnLaLIk8inYjocVnM48Q/rqgt0mWl8mxKpdqamv+LGLb77qxQKZGrfRso3VZXeUbbGm2XYEcVGAmt/+AlTOWcORIjVh+CwLrhdvZH+juUx5005qIEfAiynYMlqyfg6k=;
- In-reply-to: <AD466E5E3A2347ED8F7257B4E44AD9B1@GavinsLaptop>
- Reply-to: tft@brainiac.com
- Sender: tft-admin@brainiac.com
I'd agree that this is probably over the top complexity wise, which I suspect is why you didn't pursue it. I'd probably just use the +1/-1 per level you already have, or the +2/-2 regardless of level in Advanced Melee.
--- On Fri, 2/20/09, Gavin@TheFantasyQuest.com <Gavin@TheFantasyQuest.com> wrote:
> From: Gavin@TheFantasyQuest.com <Gavin@TheFantasyQuest.com>
> Subject: Re: (TFT) Bringing Melee Wizard into the 3rd Dimension
> To: tft@brainiac.com
> Date: Friday, February 20, 2009, 1:38 PM
> I like "easy". +2/-2 suits my style.
>
> Gavin Gossett
> The Fantasy Quest
> TFQ Games
>
> Gavin@TheFantasyQuest.com
> www.TheFantasyQuest.com
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David O.
> Miller" <davidomiller@verizon.net>
> To: <tft@brainiac.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 3:02 PM
> Subject: Re: (TFT) Bringing Melee Wizard into the 3rd
> Dimension
>
>
> > Oh absolutely Neal. In my rules the miniature figures
> all have a height score and once you are higher than that
> they can not attack. We are talking about figures that are
> still within reach of each other. What pluses or minuses
> does a figure get that's swinging down at a foe one
> step higher, two steps higher, waist higher, standing right
> next to someone's head, etc.? Any higher than that
> would put you into pole weapon, thrown or missile range.
> >
> > Or does it matter? Should it be a flat +2 higher/-2
> lower or something more detailed and tactical?
> >
> > David O. Miller
> >
> >
> > On Feb 20, 2009, at 3:39 PM, raito@raito.com wrote:
> >
> >> My thought is that past a certain height
> differential, you're out of range of the other guy
> (except with missile or thrown weapons).
> >> Neil Gilmore
> >> raito@raito.com
> >>
> >> Quoting "David O. Miller"
> <davidomiller@verizon.net>:
> >>> One idea I toyed with was this: the higher up
> you go the greater the
> >>> plus to hit, up to a point, then it starts
> going back down again. Think of standing a few steps higher
> than your foe on a staircase. You'd be at an advantage,
> thus a plus to hit him. But another person,
> >>> standing to the left and on a much higher
> landing for instance, would
> >>> actually have to stoop somewhat to hit the
> lower foe. Not a great
> >>> combat stance to be in and so, perhaps, he
> would not gain any pluses. It's a more complicated rule
> but it is something that I had considered
> >>> but eventually decided against. Maybe that
> could work for you.
> >>> Modifiers to hit due to height:
> >>>
> >>> One level higher +1
> >>> Two levels higher +2
> >>> Three levels higher +1
> >>> Four levels higher -
> >>> Five levels higher -1
> >>> Six levels higher -2
> >>>
> >>> One level lower -1
> >>> Two levels lower -2
> >>> Three levels lower -3
> >>> Four levels lower -4
> >>> etc....
> >>> Of course I'm really just talking off the
> top of my head here. This
> >>> might cause other problems I haven't
> thought through yet. What's
> >>> everyone else's thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> David O. Miller
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 20, 2009, at 12:45 PM, Sgt Hulka wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > That's exactly my point...the beauty
> of the rest of your rules is
> >>> > that they *don't* have to be scaled
> to anything. As far as I can
> >>> > tell (and admittedly I could be wrong
> here) they all relate to
> >>> > either the actual height of the figures
> themselves, or to the
> >>> > figure's base size. >
> >>> > But, and this is a big but, I haven't
> actually tried the +1/-1 per
> >>> > level rule and maybe it's not such a
> big deal. Yeah, I could get as
> >>> > high as +4/-4, but on the other hand,
> more often I'd probably just
> >>> > be dealing with +1/-1 on a typical hill
> slope. So maybe it's better
> >>> > as-is. =====
> >>> Post to the entire list by writing to
> tft@brainiac.com. Unsubscribe by mailing to
> majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
> >>> "unsubscribe tft"
> >> =====
> >> Post to the entire list by writing to
> tft@brainiac.com.
> >> Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com
> with the message body
> >> "unsubscribe tft"
> >
> > __________________________________________
> > David O. Miller
> > Miller Design/Illustration
> > www.davidomiller.com
> >
> > Network Diagram Solutions
> > www.diagramsolutions.com
> >
> > davidomiller@verizon.net
> >
> > P.O. Box 1453
> > East Northport, NY 11731
> > (631) 266-6875
> > =====
> > Post to the entire list by writing to
> tft@brainiac.com.
> > Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with
> the message body
> > "unsubscribe tft"
> =====
> Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
> Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the
> message body
> "unsubscribe tft"
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"