[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (TFT) Re: TFT Digest V3 #1215
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: (TFT) Re: TFT Digest V3 #1215
- From: Sgt Hulka <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 07:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1249656967; bh=L5LLBE280pz8i6y1TY2WvNAVdwNigG7UJhmp3Q6tGqc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=DrNBDRfo4Hu+cTGWFLlinz0CE+yhSWQTlRM8h1EAjO+vuoke4W/IWqtlHG1dy8wMULafU0bt0L3ld9vIk9tEvicasKtbHls1l7zT255ChBrZMfVrf7hoFEJbQNBSfr0MW0MDVkl9h4ISXkwBJT28UO8UuZLv8ZPiGh9TpV+1wzM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xN6Ka4gcipz9igBsCHU5mr1FC39owSdpoKzDa9vLKGp2dROlqAmmn+6Aw/2klKs3u84OQcL/YyC9RI2gjdOFfkCkO1B6OhuV3kWYk2wG/znz1nr555W/lzBl7AQ95L9g/77V4Y7TpQfJktrEgDhvqUUJj9CD8EUr7MVNUlgTnBI=;
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com>
- Reply-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Sender: email@example.com
--- On Wed, 8/5/09, Mark Tapley <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> From: Mark Tapley <email@example.com>
> Subject: (TFT) Re: TFT Digest V3 #1215
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Date: Wednesday, August 5, 2009, 7:12 AM
> At 22:14 -0400 8/4/09, Jim wrote:
> > So here's something I was wondering, and I didn't
> really see it in the book.
> > Turn order goes from highest adjDX to lowest,
> Right. I have played both that action
> order is re-evaluated dynamically (which I prefer) and that
> action order is determined at the start of the action phase
> (based on intended actions) and remains the same through the
> > 1) Attacking figures in the sides or rear.
> I'm pretty sure you will get your
> > turn sooner in this case. Same as if an opponent
> knocks down an adjacent
> > enemy. If your turn hasn't come yet, you can
> attack that figure and go
> > earlier right?
> Right. Say you were adjDX 10 against the
> figure while it was standing, then at adjDX 12 your buddy
> did 8 points and the figure fell in front of you. Your adjDX
> jumps from 10 to 14, so your "turn to act" has already
> passed according to the DX count-off. You are entitled to
> act immediately at that point according to the "dynamic"
> turn sequence that I like to play under; it's as if you had
> adjDX 14 to begin with, but "delayed your action" to adjDX
> > 2) Missile or thrown weapons at long
> ranges. I don't think this one applies,
> > but I could be wrong. If you were to throw a
> weapon 3 hexes, would that lower
> > your DX by 3?
> For purposes of the to-hit roll, yes,
> but I play that it does not lower adjDX for purposes of
> sequence of attack. I could go either way on this, though. I
> can see arguments both ways.
> > 3) Special bonuses or talents. If you have
> +3 DX for missile weapons, do you
> > factor that into turn order? What about if you
> spend a turn waiting to get +1
> > DX next turn. Is that accounted for too?
> What about spells that increase
> > your DX?
> Yes, for all three. Certainly in the
> case of bows, practicing allows you to get shots off much
> quicker, and that seems implicit in the "2 shots per turn"
> rules as well. In the case of "waiting for an opening" I'd
> almost be willing to say that you get to shoot first, with
> the pole weapons, next turn, but that would definitely be a
> house rule.
> > 4) Special actions like Aimed Shots or Sweeping
> Blows. If you declare you're
> > taking a sweeping blow, does your turn come at -4 DX?
> I would say yes, but again could go
> either way on these.
> > 5) Fighting with multiple weapons. If you
> have the talent, your 2nd strike
> > is at a lower DX. Do you attack with both at
> once, or does your second attack
> > come later in the round?
> Second attack later in the round,
> > Those are all the circumstances I can think of right
> now. I don't have the
> > rules with me now, but I don't remember reading the
> exceptions to this. I'm
> > just kind of getting a grasp on the rules now, and
> this is the one thing that
> > I think is most complicated to figure out.
> Looking over the referee's screen:
> Dazzle spells should slow down everyone affected, IMHO.
> This only matters when the dazzle includes some of the
> combatants but not others, since the wizard casting just
> used up his action. Well, OK, two weapons+ thrown dazzle gem
> would be one other case.
> Rope spells should slow down the victim.
> Shadow/Fire spells should slow down people inside them.
> Invisibility/Blur should slow down people attacking their
> Shapeshift to something hard to hit (snake?) should slow
> down attackers (yeah, as if...)
> Related to "knock down" above, if your buddy successfully
> enters HTH from a front hex for his action and he and the
> opponent fall in front of you, your adjDX jumps up by 4.
> Changing how many Sha-Ken you are throwing changes your
> adjDX, and therefore when you attack.
> Still probably not comprehensive, but
> enough to get the idea.
> Mark 210-379-4635
> Large Asteroids headed toward planets
> inhabited by beings that don't have
> technology adequate to stop them:
> Think of it as Evolution in
> Post to the entire list by writing to email@example.com.
> Unsubscribe by mailing to firstname.lastname@example.org
> with the message body
> "unsubscribe tft"
Post to the entire list by writing to email@example.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to firstname.lastname@example.org with the message body