Re: (TFT) Last one for the night: Target gets hit by higher Dx for disengaging

[Rick Smith <rsmith@lightspeed.ca>]

There was an alternate rule that was published in
the last edition of basic melee that goes like this:

Meeple A = A, Meeple B = B

A has DX 13, B has DX 11.

If A disengages from B, normally B can do nothing
and if he can't attack anyone else, he wastes his 
turn.

The new rules says B can attack the disengaging A,
as A leaves, with a DX negative equal to the 
difference of the adj DX.  So 13 - 11 = 2 so B
would attack at -2 adj DX (needing a 9 or less to
hit).

We have long used these rules with no problems.

Warm regards, Rick.


On Wed, 2011-15-06 at 19:07 -0700, Rune Science wrote:
> page 14 of AM:
> 
> Target gets attacked by higher Dx for disengaging?
> 
> meeple A is adjDX 11.  meeple B is adjDX 9. Presumably meeple A has already 
> attacked, and B watns to run away.  Meeple A has already attacked but from what 
> I under stand in the rules it looks like A gets a parting shot on the defender. 
> Is this correct?
> 
> Now if we reverse it and say Meeple A is disengaging, it looks like B does not 
> get a parting shot because his dex is lower. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> verify please?
> =====
> Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
> Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
> "unsubscribe tft"
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"