[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (TFT) Reality vs. Game Mechanics
There's a similar phenomenon at work in the bow section of the weapons
table. A longbow doesn't necessarily do more damage than a horse bow.
The bow that does more damage is the bow that shoots an arrow harder,
which means the bow with a heavier draw weight, regardless of style.
(Someone, somewhere, had a formula for how much damage a bow does per
ST of the user, reflecting draw weight, but I've unfortunately
forgotten what it was, and whose brilliant idea.)
In the end it looks like SJ just decided to use names of weapons based
on how powerful they sounded, rather than how accurately they reflect
reality. The problem could be fixed by just renaming weapons things
like, "Sword wielded by a ST X figure", or "Wimpy Sword" vs. "Giant
Honking Sword". But that just doesn't have the same ring to it.
As far as rapiers and Two Weapons... if you have that talent, you
should be able to wield any two weapons you have the ST for (given
practice with that particular combination). If you're ST 20-odd and
can wield two Giant Honking Normally-Two-Handed Swords (aka
greatswords), why not? PC's with that many attribute points are death-
on-legs anyway.
I'd be interested in hearing your opinion on the relative merits/
drawbacks of axes vs. swords, and how that could be reflected in terms
of game mechanics.
- Meg
On Oct 7, 2011, at 11:23 AM, PvK wrote:
Seems to me the low-end TFT "Rapier" is more like what was called a
small sword than a rapier. It does seem inaccurate to have a late
fencing weapon included on a medieval sword list as simply the
wimpiest sword, with no redeeming qualities except that you could do
Fencing/Two Weapons with it (for an obviously bogus reason in the
Two Weapons Talent - clearly Earth Florentine teaching habits have
no reason to have anything to do with Cidri).
Also seems to me that the weights are clearly not historically nor
physically accurate. One might try to rationalize them in terms of
"effective weight", to support the trade-off between cost and weight
which is really there for color and game balance rather than for
realism, it seems to me. I would prefer to use real weights, but I
do think there are other differences between swords and axes in
terms of cost and performance which TFT fails to capture. (GURPS
tries and it seems to me does a much more accurate and detailed/
cumbersome job, but isn't perfectly accurate either.)
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"