Re: (TFT) Re: Sha Ken

[Joel BoardgameRpger <joel.siragher@gmail.com>]

On there other hand if your opponent is in any sort of metal armor those
shaken dont pose much, if any, threat.

Are those sha ken rolled individually?

penalty for throwing mutiple
damage reduction for medium armor.

im on the fence about this.

To beat a dead dog: this is a perfect example of not allowing face shots.
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Jay Carlisle <maou.tsaou@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:41 AM, David Bofinger wrote:
>
> > On the subject of sha ken, a rule I like generally is that if a figure
> > voluntarily takes a negative modifier - e.g. a multiple sha ken fling, or
> > an aim for the face - then it passes up its right to automatic, double
> and
> > triple damage hits.
> >
> >
> I can see that.
> I'd like to know about it during character creation but otherwise wouldn't
> gripe about it.
> Part of it comes down to what damage actually is.
> Physicker doesn't distinguish between first aid and surgery and internal
> injuries aren't treated with first aid.
> With 5 second turns damage could be seen as being the result of a flurry of
> moderate blows as easily as in a single strike although the default
> assumption for player imagination seems to be the single blow.
>  =====
> Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
> Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
> "unsubscribe tft"
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"