[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(TFT) Re: Dodging arrows
At 16:27 -0600 8/27/13, Neil wrote (accidentally off-list):
SCA standard is 30lbs @ 28 inches for bows.
Thanks! Pretty sure I'd read that somewhere, but a while ago.
Interesting, I'd missed the draw length before. <munchkin> Do they
let really tall guys that can draw 32 inches use the same bow, and
draw it up to 36 lbs or so?
Crossbows vary somewhat. The arrows are slower mostly from the
poundage, not the ammunition. There isn't that much padding. I'll
occasionally get a bruise, nut nothing big.
Ouch! Oh, misprint, good.
Those English cloth yard shafts were not light. Check out the Merry
Rose stuff for more info.
Yeah, 150 lbs by some estimates. I've read some of the
research, and I understand the claims, but I still don't completely
I'm truly no expert, but if those weights were really
practical I can't help thinking there'd be an Olympic class with a
draw weight up there. Every other Olympic sport is producing physical
freaks that do nothing but train for that sport, and every other
Olympic sport is producing records well in excess of what was ever
documented in antiquity (or recorded history, for that matter). *All
else being equal*, I think a heavier bow is more accurate because the
archer has to compensate less for wind, gravity, etc. etc. and
therefore, the Olympic guys would be at least experimenting with
them. I never hear of any modern longbows above about 60 pounds, so
I'm claiming that's close to the upper limit for a bow which produces
repeatable long-range accuracy.
I can think of one exception to my reasoning, though. I will
grant that for some phases of combat, the archer can wait until the
opponent is close enough that he won't miss even with a really heavy
bow, and then shoot. I think it's quite possible each archer had
*two* bows; one about 60 pounds for long-range fusillades where
accuracy counted, and one 100 or 150 pounds for a desperation last
shot that really needed to stop the target. That would account for
the existence of the monster bows, but relegate them to very rare use
(and might also account for the fact that they still exist, in
preference to the lighter general-use bows - those bows got worn out
with practice, while the monster bows were left carefully preserved
on the shelf).
- Mark 210-379-4635
Large Asteroids headed toward planets
inhabited by beings that don't have
technology adequate to stop them:
Think of it as Evolution in Fast-Forward.
Post to the entire list by writing to email@example.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to firstname.lastname@example.org with the message body