[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(TFT) Re: Dodging arrows
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: (TFT) Re: Dodging arrows
- From: David Bofinger <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 02:34:26 +1000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=nlXiLdTMikQ5JY0wTc3X3DJIwSKmc8R2m2SF4azL+VQ=; b=Op/nwIEvt0oMlEWpk/Pl3zQ6EofDEwwcpP48cRNgRUmgs1yQMWicAA1rF9cnh1R4op m0m4bB1MW4HxuaVY9aT8hdsxVuhOJl/yMCe6niNLVJC25CEQ9KP/7uM6ssAImZcFzw5b nAPxp+F2+XORgu1q4rQh4ND6op4xRxbRuQpjlA0cGXLLOWlgC+oWx0akGXzsBs5IREXA o3qOJpCK1qLjbnMtrzbszfS5VzyQZaLyiFJxxZ1CpJhkBaU6sWiFL2utMZXEp8m8AcfA dYOVIhuymt73wo4FYkQlv7iqo433EUysKvC6IZbLJK4kRb9BQQjXLVSSBP2rOGFh80A8 8kHA==
- Reply-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Sender: email@example.com
> And there's alos accounts (both European and Japanese) of guys coming out
> of a battle with nary a scratch, but with enough arrows hanging out of
> their armour to make it difficult to swing.
Can't recall where I saw it now but I think there's a letter home from a
famous crusader remarking that he'd been hit by eleven arrows in his last
battle, and that he saw it as a sign of God's favour, not that they didn't
penetrate, but that he should be hit by so few. (The bows might not have
been as powerful as longbows, though.)
We can argue about *why* it took so many arrows to kill someone under
battle conditions, but we know it did.
At Crecy they had horses to aim at, with IIUC not much barding, so they
probably did a good deal better.
>>> the English lost [...] poor generalship
Depends on your standard. Compared with the French generals who lost Crecy
and Agincourt they were always pretty good. :-)
>> On advantage of any self bow is that it can be made in the field
That's true as far as it goes. But IIUC making arrows is basically a lot
more work than making bows anyway, so I'm not sure it's that important.
I'm guessing the self bow's tolerance for moisture was pretty important to
the English. The classic way to waterproof wood is varnish but you can't do
that with wood that bends so composite bows were always vulnerable to
water. Hence composite bows being more common in dry places.
Post to the entire list by writing to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Unsubscribe by mailing to email@example.com with the message body