[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (TFT) New file added to Rick's rules. New Armor in TFT.
- To: <tft@brainiac.com>
- Subject: Re: (TFT) New file added to Rick's rules. New Armor in TFT.
- From: Jeffrey Vandine <jlv61560@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 20:58:35 +0000 (UTC)
- Authentication-results: zappa.brainiac.com; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com header.i=@yahoo.com header.b=q8UfUmqo
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1463950887; bh=vdF/IapUpRQGl/6kFg5etR/2RpErYGYMa+KCb8KhtNQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=q8UfUmqoe/s7KwRRevvdGW5eefJMXXjDCIKlF+IW54/bQSCvz2VBSbfumbU1DBa1hm14Hl23aDuuZsv4RG9FV3N9vVvMoPMWzV6ZOr4i884UGS8EC3i/UgFU9fkqNJu/0mJpfASv1fS4kuvTUElY7MJIuG6cHQLFO5TaRjww011E907lzsw75oyRbmzhHhOcgc/ipy3CUo5cZhoq4KLlegP+txq8GUCCF0UW5vm/0k7zawV06arLNARyGI2n7JcjtK407wStvvu+UUeTuRRJqIROhUMHMu+G28FvaW3Y3QqZNHYYyL+suio3EWHeFzJlntd3oGq6SSoLl46ajFerIg==
- References: <575050650.666491.1463950715311.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: tft@brainiac.com
- Sender: tft-admin@brainiac.com
Ah, that would be one reason why I was confused, but can you explain why the Threshold number is LESS than the No Negatives number on your armor table? That is certainly contributing to my confusion... ;-)
v/r
Jeff
PS, yes I had read the article (thus my comment that I was confused there too).
--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 5/22/16, Rick Smith <rick_ww@lightspeed.ca> wrote:
Subject: Re: (TFT) New file added to Rick's rules. New Armor in TFT.
To: tft@brainiac.com
Date: Sunday, May 22, 2016, 1:46 PM
Hi Jeff,
I am assuming that you have read the
"Advantages of Great ST" article which
describes the advantages of high ST on armor in
detail.
Actually, you
have it backwards. At the No Negatives #, neither your DX
or MA
is penalized. At the Threshold #,
you start to be penalized less, starting with DX.
If there are not rules on
something, treat it as per normal. This is particularly
true for names.
Warm regards, Rick.
On 2016-05-22, at 1:36 PM,
Jeffrey Vandine wrote:
>
I have to add the following:
>
> The brief discussion of Threshold Number
and No Negatives Number is confusing. You state that at
the Threshold Number neither your DX nor your MA are
penalized. Then, at the No Negatives Number, you state
that "your great strength is kicking in" and you
suffer one less DX penalty. Since the Threshold Number
precedes the "No Negatives Number" in each case,
does that mean that when you get to the no negatives number,
your DX actually IMPROVES by one (say, if your base DX is
12, due to your great strength, it now becomes a 13)? This
is the same issue I had with the Great Strength rules a
while back -- it seems internally contradictory and clearly
not what you intend. Can you please fix the description to
make it clearer?
>
>
Sorry to always sound negative; but I guess that's the
nature of "critique."
>
> On the plus side, I like a lot of the
additions, though you're assuming knowledge on our part
as to details of things like Goblin Chain, or Elven Chain,
as John pointed out below...
>
> v/r
> Jeff
>
--------------------------------------------
> On Sun, 5/22/16, John Linzy <jslinzy@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Subject:
RE: (TFT) New file added to Rick's rules. New Armor in
TFT.
> To: tft@brainiac.com
> Date: Sunday, May 22, 2016, 7:46 AM
>
> Rick:
> A
> question and a
correction:
>
> Q) Do
you have any write-ups on the different
>
armor types to explain how
> they differ?
> Goblin chain, Elven chain, etc.
>
> C) I think the
second paragraph contains a
> typo.
You've misspelled full as
>
"foll"
>
>
Thanks for posting this!
> john
>
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: tft-admin@brainiac.com
> [mailto:tft-admin@brainiac.com]
> On Behalf Of
> Rick
Smith
> Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2016 2:20
AM
> To: tft@brainiac.com
> Subject: Re: (TFT) New file added to
Rick's
> rules. New Armor in TFT.
>
> Sorry,
> the Armor is
> here...
>
> http://tft.brainiac.com/RicksTFT/Weapons_Equipment/TFT_Armor.html
>
> It is
in the equipment part
> of my pages.
>
> Warm
> regards, Rick.
>
>
>
> On 2016-05-21, at 9:34 PM,
> Jeffrey Vandine wrote:
>
>>
> Erm...was there supposed to be a link
there? ;-)
>>
>
--------------------------------------------
>> On Sat, 5/21/16, Rick Smith <rick_ww@lightspeed.ca>
> wrote:
>>
>> Subject:
> (TFT)
New file added to Rick's rules. New Armor in
> TFT.
>> To: tft@brainiac.com
>> Date: Saturday, May 21, 2016, 8:51
AM
>>
>> Hi
all,
>> These rules connect to
the
> Great ST rules.
>>
>> There
are more types of Armor
> in TFT and they
are now more logical.
>> Best of
all, with high ST, you can wear
> any of
the various types of
>> armor with
> no negatives to DX and MA.
>>
>> As
normal, I welcome comments
> and
questions.
>>
>> Warm regards, Rick.
>>
>>
>> =====
>> Post to
the
> entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
>> Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com
> with the message body
>>
>
"unsubscribe tft"
>>
>>
> =====
>> Post to the entire list by
> writing to tft@brainiac.com.
>> Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com
> with the message body
>>
>
"unsubscribe tft"
>
>
=====
> Post to the entire list
> by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
> Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com
> with the message body
>
"unsubscribe
> tft"
>
> =====
> Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
> Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com
> with the message body
>
"unsubscribe
> tft"
>
> =====
> Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
> Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com
with the message body
> "unsubscribe
tft"
=====
Post to the entire list
by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com
with the message body
"unsubscribe
tft"
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"