[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (TFT) Random thoughts on rpg combat systems.
----- Original Message -----
> On Fri, 31 May 2002 04:44:32 -0700 rsmith <email@example.com> wrote:
> [many interesting things]
> Okay, here's some random thoughts of my own in response. I do have a
nice, concise thought on the longbow situation, but I'll put that in another
post, so it doesn't get lost in these musings:
> Regarding what TFT is and should be, I'd like to say that TFT is many
things to many people.
> Me, I'm a wargamer at heart. My players tend that way too. To me, the
> secondary. It's not trivial, but it's secondary. The genius of TFT is
that it has tactical
> richness (compared to most RPG's) but with reasonable speed--which is why
> it to GURPS. GURPS adds a lot of complexity, which may or may not mean
> or interesting game choices, but often doesn't. (Speaking in general, not
at GURPS specifically.)
I agree with you. I like TFT for 2 reasons. First, the tactical combat
system outshines any other RPG -- despite its sometimes annoying flaws. In
my games, the battles are a significant part of the story. I find that
"roleplaying" is often overrated myself. After a long week at the office, I
just want to kill something. I have plenty of sophisticated "richness" in my
daily life. I like RPGs to give me an escape, just like a good Bruce or
Arnold action flick. TFT does that admirably well.
Second, TFT is a fast game to start. A player can create a reasonably
well-defined character in about 5 minutes. No other RPG that's worth playing
can do this.
These two features offset the myriad of flaws in TFT in my opinion.
Post to the entire list by writing to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Unsubscribe by mailing to email@example.com with the message body