Re: (TFT) More on Predict Weather & Control Weather.

[ErolB1@aol.com]

In a message dated 2/27/2003 8:04:19 PM Central Standard Time, 
mfraser@canada.com writes:

> On a more fundamental level, I agree with Rick and Cas's arguments that 
this
> spell doesn't cost enough fatigue for the (potentially large) area that if
> affects.

That's a fair criticism. I do tend to lowball St costs for new spells, partly 
because I've toned down the St costs in Etan for existing spells (mostly by 
increasing duration), and partly because I think there's a too-great tendency 
to give high-IQ spells a high St cost. I'd like to see more high-IQ / low-St 
spells in general, even if "Control Weather" isn't appropriate as one. 

So... What do you (Matt, Rick, Cas, et al) think is the appropriate St cost 
for what the spell does?

Erol K. Bayburt
Evil Genius for a Better Tomorrow
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"