Re: (TFT) House Rules?

[raito@raito.com]

See, I'm against using that kind of system for TFT. 

If a priestly character wants spells, let him buy spells. 

I'm afraid I just don't see where your sort of suggestion allows for 
more divergence. Allowing more choice allows more divergence. One of 
the hallmarks of TFT for me is that characters can be built in many, 
many different ways. 

D&D is fine, but there a fighter is a fighter is a fighter (and more 
recent versions of the game try mostly unsuccessfully to change this). 

In TFT, there's no generic character. 

Neil Gilmore
raito@raito.com

Quoting Matthew Skipper <tywyll@yahoo.com>:
> Hey,
> Thanks for sharing!
> I definitely agree that 'Fencing' should just be 'Weapon Mastery'. 
> Interesting take on Priests.  I'm interested in more 'High Fantasy' priests
> myself.  I'm thinking I might just make a 'Talent Tree' which would allow
> people to learn a select number of associated spells that are related to the
> God(s) with a Priest and High Priest Talent broadening the selection (kind of
> the Gurps Magic suggestion). 
> I'm also thinking of broadening the attributes (something I know many, many
> people have done....).  I think splitting them in Half equates fairly 
> well and
> allows for a bit more divergence in character builds especially at higher
> level. 
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"