[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (TFT) Rules?

Hi Marc,

Okay you got me thinking so Ibll just jump right in here.

Itbs been quite some time now since the idea of a Social Contract was called to my attention, thanks to someone on this list actuallyb& As I recall I was initially skeptical of the idea, but BOY has it grown on me.

However, referring to the Tic-Tac-Toe example you mention;
bIn TTT, there is the agreement about who goes first that needs to be agreed upon, a very simple social contract.b
then go on to say;
bObviously in RPGs, the less that the rules define explicitly, the more the social contract comes into play.b Now this is shooting right at the heart of the matter I think, but I also think itbs important to point out here that this part of the Social Contract (along with the implied bwe shall follow the rules of TTT) is agreed upon before the play session starts.

I know that this sounds like a nit-picky detail but I think itbs important in defining the difference between the types of bgamesb webre talking about.

I use the terms Abstract, Conceptual, and Model to try and get a handle on the kinds of games with some games having meta-levels.

Tic-Tac-Toe would be abstract.
An abstract game is simple and self-contained.
TTT is simple in rules and its Social Contract and doesnbt use any bbackgroundb.

Basic Board-games like Candy Land or Monopoly are pretty Conceptual in their play. Strip away the trappings of the concept from the equipment and rules and these type games are very similar. The concepts of a stroll through Willie Wonka land or youbre a real estate tycoon are part of the Social Contract here I think and help to differentiate one board-game from another.

A model type game focuses on a concept.
Implied in the SC here is that the strong model game adapts itself to the details of the concept strongly. Take the concept away from something like Squad Leader and youbve got a strange critter on your hands, not much like anything else...

Strongly related sub-sets can be thought of as being ordered along meta-levels. A game of TTT can be played binsideb a game of 3d-TTT meaning 3d-TTT is meta to TTT.

A full blown RPG is interesting to consider from a meta view.
Pretty much, if you can get a correspondence to pen and paper for a given game then a player could play that game inside the RPG (real-time computer games would need to be conceptualized). This is mostly because I put RPGbs pretty much at the extreme opposite of TTT as a game that implies in its SC of play to be a more or less strong model of brealityb. As such, I use a kind of compound approach for many aspects of game-play and adapt other strong model games to handle the mechanics, such as using Dragon Pass like rules to describe strategic scale play, Squad Leader stuff a scale level down, and TFT AM for the up close and personal stuff. Doing this however, the players could actually play the exact same system I use for something like war as a bgameb inside the RPG.

Stuff like that implies a more complicated SC than that required for TTT.
For the Goblin port Ibm loosely using the three systems mentioned above as the bframeb. The majority of the game-play focuses on the Squad Leader scale for missile fire and TFT for melee combat with the Dragon Pass scale used to determine aspects like the arrival of reinforcements and determining where engagements are likely to happen. This means that the SCbs of all three games are encompassed by the overall scenarios SC.
This makes the SC clearer IMO.
A player who doesnbt care for war-games can listen to the play offer and refuse rather than me having them broll upb Figures and then slapping them into this war-game junkb& As a matter of fact, therebs all kinds of more traditional scenarios that pop up just by moving chits around on the Dragon Pass level and extrapolating a couple of results from the conditions.

Therebs recon missions, supply lines (caravan guard Figures get a pretty much automatic encounter if traveling a route compromised by hostiles), smuggling, and general profiteeringb& not to mention, when better to make a good old fashioned dungeon crawl run to the goblin mountains than when lots of goblins are out raiding for food?

Ibm just now pulling many of these topics together in a way that I can begin to try and talk about clearly. PLEASE note the word try in the above as Ibm CLEARLY not clear about any of this yet. Some of this stuff is sophomoric at its very bestb& see my next post on the upper bound complexity tree value of the original Melee and my attempt to answer it today boff the top of my head (more like depths of my ass)b for a plain example. Quite a bit of this stuff works well in practice, some of it only really works for me personally (even a weirdo has some personality strengths), and quite a bit more is mostly speculation.
Currently, I think of badventuresb as bRP3 filesb.
By RP3 I mean that not only the main scale-level of play should be well described, but also the scale-levels immediately above and below the main scale level as well.
Also, certain fundamentals can be bcompressedb.
Consider dice.

1d6 is a rough percentage of 16.6% chance per face of occurring on a single cast.
% chance of rolling number or under;
1 =  16.6, 2 = 33.3, 3 = 50, 4 = 66.6, 5 = 83.3, 6 = 100

% chance of rolling number or under compared to 1d6;
1(1d6) = 2-4(2d6), 2(1d6) = 2-5(2d6 bad match), 3(1d6) = 2-7(2d6 bad match), 4(1d6) = 2-8(2d6 bad match), 5(1d6) = 2-9(2d6), 6(1d6) = 2-12(2d6)

% chance of rolling number or under compared to 1d6;
1(1d6) = 3-7(3d6), 2(1d6) = 3-9(3d6), 3(1d6) = 10(3d6), 4(1d6) = 3-11(3d6), 5(1d6) = 3-13(3d6), and 6(1d6) = 3-18(3d6)

Ibll keep pluggin away but a chime from my mail informs me that poor Mr. Beards account is trying to spam me againb&
Perhaps I should give it a rest for now?
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"