Re: (TFT) Chainmail and Plate armour DX adjustement inconsistencies (was Rule clarification)

[Denis DesHarnais <denisdesharnais@gmail.com>]

Of course, right under that, it repeats the -3 for chain again.  I'm
guessing he was still playing with the rules during final edits ....

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Denis DesHarnais <denisdesharnais@gmail.com
> wrote:

> For the melee (pre-advanced) edition, it looks like the correct numbers
> were chain, -4, lg shield, -1.  This is based on the combat example at the
> end of the rules.  The adjusted dex of the figure in chain and lg shield is
> -5.  Looks like the earlier -3 for chain was a typo.
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:44 PM, <raito@raito.com> wrote:
>
>> Quoting Joe Hartley <jh@brainiac.com>:
>>
>>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 12:03:51 -0500
>>> raito@raito.com wrote:
>>> > Quoting PvK <pvk@oz.net>:
>>> > > Cool! Thanks for the link and congratulations on what may be a first
>>> > > edition of
>>> > > Melee!
>>> >
>>> > Sorry, but that's not the first edition. Boardgamegeek shows it as 3rd
>>> > and 5th, from the graphics. My own memory says that it's a later
>>> > edition.
>>> http://maverick.brainiac.com/cmm/mic.html
>>>
>>> This page shows a first edition Melee cover on the 2nd row, rightmost
>>> image.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, that's the one I'm thinking of. My personal one is the edition next
>> to it (the full color one).
>> Neil Gilmore
>> raito@raito.com
>> =====
>>  Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
>> Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
>> "unsubscribe tft"
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"