[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (TFT) Chainmail and Plate armour DX adjustement inconsistencies (was Rule clarification)

To: tft@brainiac.com
Subject: Re: (TFT) Chainmail and Plate armour DX adjustement inconsistencies (was Rule clarification)
From: Nathan Easton <n.m.easton@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:13:20 -0600
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jPGh9U5o72j7B2Fj9tFzzxE0+jblEXn4M1rxEfmEsxA=; b=GZWASwLcGZf6qwQYKmVoOS6pHZJsVELHJBXKCtJoz9Lax1SMDOvOvxyJ9fDb0NV8TT /3GDtjsx9H4lPS+fNZ19uBWXk6JPS7MkmS9oFb2pTZ8WCgNbSrSsyfG6waX3Am1hQcFN Y3ou5/ILbV5ny0MsqgGdRKpAGDfVphRi8Zg4I=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=WXYsF7LInuOoCst5geWEv/rbsCdvKdR1Si+tuUq/p7+ABL4gTWrsIKpHi9ZUcNIl5G ANsk1gvDxyVPGbQuC1Imxskl2Q3KYLRu/V5eHaR358SrnVbkug9Wy4u80LVYf7pX7Tzp hK2SnHOR6For+tr8AqX0JPUBzwV29kPaUHK08=
In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=MtNGAngOwWBA6BUPu6pfWb+Wi-MmmSw1OojCm@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110310182822.u7gcw3k19pdogsgk@webmail.hostberbee.com> <AANLkTi=MtNGAngOwWBA6BUPu6pfWb+Wi-MmmSw1OojCm@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: tft@brainiac.com
Sender: tft-admin@brainiac.com

When I'm the referee, both can be serious considerations.

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Jim Kundert <gypsycomet@gmail.com> wrote:

> Pedantry Sidebar:
>
> >consider that cannon
> >according to canon
>
> A "Canon" is a body of law or accepted truths or definitions.  It is
> also a camera company (TM) and a city in Georgia.
> A "Cannon" is a big gun.
>
> end Sidebar.
> =====
> Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
> Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
> "unsubscribe tft"
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"

References:
- Re: (TFT) Chainmail and Plate armour DX adjustement inconsistencies (was Rule clarification)
  - From: raito@raito.com
- Re: (TFT) Chainmail and Plate armour DX adjustement inconsistencies (was Rule clarification)
  - From: Jim Kundert <gypsycomet@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (TFT) Chainmail and Plate armour DX adjustement inconsistencies (was Rule clarification)
Next by Date: Re: (TFT) Chainmail and Plate armour DX adjustement inconsistencies (was Rule clarification)
Previous by thread: Re: (TFT) Chainmail and Plate armour DX adjustement inconsistencies (was Rule clarification)
Next by thread: Re: (TFT) Chainmail and Plate armour DX adjustement inconsistencies (was Rule clarification)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread