[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (TFT) Wizard mods - out of balance?



I think the rules even note that a 32-point beginning character is better than average, given that the average for each attribute is 10.

In more real-world terms, anyone who got through high school calculus has the Mathematician talent (IQ 14), unless they subsequently forgot it. But the fact that they knew it at one time means they must have IQ 14 at least, and probably know several other talents, even if those talents deal with technology, etc., and therefore are not listed in ITL.

So are the readers of this list average Joes or great heroes?

- Meg


On Mar 21, 2011, at 1:49 PM, Joey Beutel wrote:

Its an interesting discussion that I could be persuaded on, but I disagree with your (non)proposal.

As for an actual.... not so much proposal, more question:
Its been brought up that starting characters in TFT are pretty powerful compared to their counterparts in other RPGs (specifically, DnD).

Personally, I think this is good, as it means my starting character will be far from 'legendary' but will already be able to at least put up a fight/pick a lock/cast a few spells.

However, using the 32 points as a 'standard' for most NPCs (farmers, guards, levied spearmen, etc) its been suggested that 32 points (and perhaps more importantly, the number of talents this usually entails) are too many.

Thoughts?
On Mar 19, 2011, at 6:10 PM, raito@raito.com wrote:

Quoting Joey Beutel <mejobo@comcast.net>:
What do you mean by 'how to make characters less powerful?'

I mean, no one ever says, "These characters are to powerful. I think we should do something so that they're less so." I have seen no proposals for this. What I do see is people trying to put more numbers on their character sheets. I have a problem with that that is directly tied to what I see as advantages of the system. A TFT character sheet is pretty simple at its base (unless you're in a game that's pedantic about carrying capacity and armour degradation). You have a name and a race. You have 3 attributes, and their adjustments. You have MA, which is calculated. You have your Talents and Spells (a short list in a canonical game). And you have some equipment. That's not a lot of info. Because it's not a lot of info, you must roleplay to have the maximum amount of fun (or you're just playing out combats, which is fine, too). When you start adding more numbers to the sheet, the tendency is to begin playing the numbers instead of the character. I don't like that. And there's really no need to. There's enough possibilities that another number on your sheet isn't going to make the game any more fun.
Let's see if I can come up with a 'less powerful' proposal...
OK, here's one. Missle Spells are way too powerful because a character could put all their strength into it. A 10 ST Lightning spell does an average of 35 points. That' enough to off a 4-hex dragon or a standard Giant in one shot. Not only that, but the character gets all the XP, and there's none for anyone else in the party. So we should limit the amount of ST in a Missle Spell to a quarter of the character's current ST. After all, as they get weaker, they shouldn't be able to cast as powerful a spell.
That's a 'less powerful' proposal. Not that I advocate for it.
Neil Gilmore
raito@raito.com
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"