[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (TFT) More Weapons, and variable strength
Rick, I don't think your system to unbalanced. It does change the
weapon choice situation. It seems better to aim for the weapon one
less than your ST, because you'll do the same damage as with a weapon
of your ST, but it will weigh and cost less. A larger affect occurs
with the choice of 2-handed weapons versus one-handed weapons, since
ST 13 Shordsword 2d, Broadsword 2d+1, Bastardsword 2d+1 or 3d-2 two-handed.
ST 14 Shordsword 2d+1, Broadsword 2d+1, Bastardsword 2d+2 or 3d-1
two-handed, 2-h.Sword 3d-1.
ST 15 Shordsword 2d+1, Broadsword 2d+2, Bastardsword 2d+2 or 3d-1
two-handed, 2-h.Sword 3d.
ST 14 Mace 2d+1, Pick 2d+1, Morningstar 2d+2, Great Hammer 2d+2
ST 15 Mace 2d+1, Pick 2d+2, Morningstar 2d+2, Great Hammer 2d+3, Battleaxe 3d
ST 16 Mace 2d+1, Pick 2d+2, Morningstar 2d+3, Great Hammer 2d+3, Battleaxe 3d+1
To me, this makes one-handed weapons with shields even more
attractive than they already were, compared to two-handed weapons.
And I might even prefer a Mace at ST 14-15, because it can be thrown.
That's not necessarily a bad thing, but I think it tends to de-value
two-handed weapons (e.g. at ST 14 and 16, there's no advantage to
using a 2-handed hammer over a one-handed morningstar, in fact
there's a weight penalty). I might add +1 damage to all two-handed
weapons to make them a more interesting choice, and for realism
reasons (in real physics, a 2-handed swing does tend to hit harder,
as does a swing with a heavier weapon).
There's also the issue of dice versus adds. As I mentioned before to
you in the context of house rules that add + some amount of damage,
the more those stack, the less varied damage amounts are, and this is
another thing adding a flat +, without ever adding dice. That's why I
wrote I would add "damage rank" rather than adding damage points.
E.g. I would follow the base progression used by the weapons: 1d,
1d+1, 1d+2, 2d-1, 2d, ... or similar, because otherwise you get ST
14, with very fine +2 Smallaxe 1d+6, which seems like a funky
predictable damage range to me, which can have gamey uses that I
don't think make real-world sense (e.g. guaranteeing penetration so
poison will take effect, or having your guy with the high-plus weapon
attack the target he's guaranteed to take out, while the high-die
weapons go for the targets that need a higher max damage).
At 12:36 AM 2/11/2015, Rick Smith wrote:
My thoughts on very strong figures being able to use weapons better:
In my campaign, if you are 1 ST higher than a weapon you do +1 damage.
If you are 2 ST higher than that, you do +2 damage.
If you are 3 ST higher than that, you do +3 damage, etc.
Post to the entire list by writing to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Unsubscribe by mailing to email@example.com with the message body