Re: (TFT) Generic Weapon Table

[Marc Gacy <marcgacy@gmail.com>]

Sorry I was off by 1, It would be a +6 and so 2d6+1 damage

On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Marc Gacy <marcgacy@gmail.com> wrote:

> If you somehow made a polearm that you could throw, the table doesn't
> preclude that; rather, common sense does. As to there not being crossbows
> (even though there are), there can be whatever you want!.  That's the whole
> point of the table, to not have just the weapons that are in the base
> rules. Honestly my table doesn't even address polearms, although if I were,
> I'd drop it down to a +7 for being a two handed weapon with a special
> ability. So a  2H polearm which impales and has a special polearm ability
> would do 2d6+2 damage.
>
> Pretty reasonable to me.
>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Peter von Kleinsmid <pvk@oz.net> wrote:
>
>> At 11:17 PM 10/2/2015, you wrote:
>>
>>> ... And there's bows,  but no crossbows?
>>>
>>
>> There are a couple of crossbows.
>>
>>
>> =====
>> Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
>> Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
>> "unsubscribe tft"
>>
>
>

=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"