[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (TFT) Rewrite of Melee simulator in JavaScript
- To: tft@brainiac.com
- Subject: Re: (TFT) Rewrite of Melee simulator in JavaScript
- From: Robert Ward <rob@dolwen.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:59:07 +0100
- Authentication-results: zappa.brainiac.com; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=dolwen.com header.i=@dolwen.com header.b=JDV3qHRX; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=axSn0AF3
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dolwen.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=kH3G1zmCb3dd9X/N8KjLYU4Jz3s=; b=JDV3qH RXGWiI0YqcpNe9GhMSzJA0rbG8OfwjLCkGGftoDWsGLeCxhBVHRtnNfAkJsUpvUZ jgv5PcNU/Y1Sl6vnh5l7spqXOJa8I/vTesPShk2FvoOgiDs20tpKBRMMbDhaGT+N 1LdueDQKN5r7l5qTpJQwQmrobyIgB9mYym0nc=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=kH3G1zmCb3dd9X/ N8KjLYU4Jz3s=; b=axSn0AF3JV5gzDm77gD0YfYOzU3z9/hXUGBahVPLmnWn3gY EAQ+Fr2+gDTMhda4PFAIW76d5ZhY4XhI66jVxnjiWXnMeWLJxyW9iqQoH/vpjWOv oS7Q8uupCZmOV1FQnV4vieO8v0XdK5kZgaXgQ/WNU+30YTLboPXklwpakytk=
- In-reply-to: <20151015114327.5C95156F@m0087793.ppops.net>
- References: <20151015114327.5C95156F@m0087793.ppops.net>
- Reply-to: tft@brainiac.com
- Sender: tft-admin@brainiac.com
Let's be sure we're reading the table the same way.
ST11;DX13;SPEAR;NO_ARMOR;NO_SHIELD 70.00
ST12;DX12;BROADSWORD;NO_ARMOR;SMALL_SHIELD 63.00
ST10;DX14;CUTLASS;LEATHER;SMALL_SHIELD 54.00
ST10;DX14;HAMMER;LEATHER;LARGE_SHIELD 51.00
ST9;DX15;RAPIER;CHAIN;LARGE_SHIELD 36.00
ST9;DX15;JAVELIN;LEATHER;LARGE_SHIELD 21.00
I see this as saying that in multiple 1-on-1 battles between these 6
characters, the spearman wins 70%, the 9/15 javelin wins only 21%.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015, at 07:43 PM, PvK wrote:
> If I follow you, I don't see how ST11;DX13;SPEAR;NO_ARMOR;NO_SHIELD would
> defeat the same character charging it by choosing to Defend on the first
> turn, 70% of the time. That makes no sense to me, so I think either I
> don't understand, or the simulation isn't correctly simulating what you
> think it does. Because, it should be less than 50%, since the defender
> will still have a (fairly decent, with enemy DX 13) chance to get hit by
> the charge, and then it's just a poke-off between two equal foe, with the
> defender possibly starting with a major wound (or even being down or
> dead).
>
> If the numbers are good and I do get what you mean, and ignoring the
> result I don't get above, then it seems like
> ST12;DX12;BROADSWORD;NO_ARMOR;SMALL_SHIELD also answers your question
> pretty well, with a 63% success rate. That design always seemed to me to
> be generally the best all-around design for generic duel purposes in
> Melee, from experience. Assuming a ST 11 DX 13 Mace/shield _dwarf_ is not
> allowed.
>
> Also, I see a win by armor: Try ST12;DX12;BROADSWORD;PLATE;LARGE_SHIELD
> =====
> Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
> Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
> "unsubscribe tft"
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"