[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Steve Jackson - major change to TFT.
- To: <tft@brainiac.com>
- Subject: Re: Steve Jackson - major change to TFT.
- From: PvK <pvk@oz.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:14:26 -0700
I don't follow - what is increasing the maximum to 45 AP offering that is less about min/max?
(It seems pretty clear to me that GM's can trivially set a different max AP level if they want.)
I think the intent of the staff ST, beyond being a nice thematic thing and a way for wizards to have more lasting spell ability in adventures, is to avoid Conan the Wizard and allow higher-powered wizards more casting power despite the AP maximum. It does of course mean there will tend to be more powerful wizards, though it does cost Experience to get and increase that ability. I think the flat 100 EP/point cost might be too little for higher levels, though.
PvK
--- ekroeten@farmersagent.com wrote:
Agreed but I can already see St 11 Dx 19 IQ 10 longbow with fine plate shooting 2x per turn with missile weapons talent.
...
From: Edward Kroeten <ekroeten@farmersagent.com>
To: tft@brainiac.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: Steve Jackson - major change to TFT.
I think it should be at bare minimum 45 AP. At 40 there is going to be a lot of min/max players.