[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Weapons for pulling you down / off balance.
- To: tft@brainiac.com
- Subject: Re: Weapons for pulling you down / off balance.
- From: raito@raito.com
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 11:52:25 -0500
- Authentication-results: mail.brainiac.com; dkim=policy reason="signing key too small" (768-bit key) header.d=raito.com header.i=@raito.com header.b="KIrzfOay"
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raito.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Reply-To:To :From:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Sender:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=93TPu7wIYLN4OQ4mVdtmLRvybN/lS0OeKxm7+2T05SQ=; b=KIrzfOayVCAqKOW2SngFm1pio5 E8jbo0HcNPZei6PO+x4bDdChpYCn2XlSMZzsm1mb5OCPZQ7nSJXIHwTaOI+37GpCONiwEod19o14Z EMdvFhDPe0OuuwzpRmyO1PziE;
- In-reply-to: <2BB756B3-B10F-4E56-94A2-9483683AE4A0@lightspeed.ca>
- References: <CAO8u+a0soSizCC3tB7My8jddhrE4Lygw8jcDKoS8om1b=PX_Kw@mail.gmail.com> <20160309204626.44785a49dca958b0bd16c370@brainiac.com> <392E23E2-90C8-461E-8BCC-28113BB8B511@lightspeed.ca> <BC5A1B6F-4FFC-4844-8D04-67455A5189DE@lightspeed.ca> <20190501221359.761BD98A@m0116952.ppops.net> <2BB756B3-B10F-4E56-94A2-9483683AE4A0@lightspeed.ca>
- User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.2 [SVN]
Hi Rick,
On Thu, May 2, 2019 10:44 am, Rick wrote:
> I think Neil was asking “does TFT need this”. Some thoughts on why we
> might want this sort of thing…
>
> — No way in TFT to dismount a rider. <— The big one.
>
> — I like the idea that you can discombobulate enemy in ways other than
> doing massive damage.
Well, I recall playing that whatever would knock down a standing figure
would dismount a rider. But I also see your point about needing ways other
than doing lots of damage.
> One thing Neil pointed out, is that the above list is not solely the
> province of hooked weapons. ’Normal’ weapons could and did some of these
> above effects.
>
> Further Neil points out that some weapons could do some of these effects,
> but not all. However, in order to avoid too great complexity, I’m
> willing to group effects.
I'd certainly group effects. But then I wouldn't try to use weapons that
only do some of the effects as justification for the maneuver.
> The suggested rules I sent out a couple days ago, didn’t try to capture
> all of the above ideas. (My rules used effects, 1, 3 and 4 only.)
> Peter suggested that many weapons have some sort of "hook rating". So
> ’normal’ weapons would have a poor hook rating but do good damage,
> where as some weird weapons would have a very high hook rating but do
> significantly less damage.
Since I don't get everything posted to the list, I missed that.
> One thing I touched on was these could set up combinations for several
> figures. I remember in a battle scene from a Viking’s TV episode, one
> viking hooked an Englishman’s shield (with their ax), and pulled it down.
> A moment
> later, another viking took advantage of the opening created, slaughtering
> the man.
A thing I've also seen done, though in my case it's usually the second row
that does the killing.
> (I think TFT underestimates the importance of shields, but that is
> another topic.)
In TFT, shields have a very simple mechanic. In reality, they tend to stop
blows completely. A more complex mechanic is to have shields just absorb
damage in some way. One way I experimented with was to say that a shield
would take the damage that the figure normally would if the die roll was
in the upper half of the range, discounting the multiple damage and
auto-hits. So if you had your maxed-out DX15 strike, anything above a 10
would go into the shield. Then use the shield degradation rules to know
how many hits it can take before it becomes useless. And a figure could
deliberately target a shield. It ended up not all that useful and I
dropped it. It really wasn't worth the extra time, and chopping though a
shield was time usually better spent trying to hit the other guy. I still
use shield degradation, though.
One thing I did keep was a Shield Talent. IQ 9, 1IQ. If a figure had this
talent and a shield, and had a friendly figure in its front hexes with the
talent and a shield, then the figure could lower the damage done in a blow
by the amount of both shields added together. So you could have up to 3
shields protecting you at a time. Most useful for armies, and a decent way
to emulate a shield wall. 3 Tower Shields stop a lot of hits.
Neil Gilmore
raito@raito.com