Re: (TFT) Gamelords

["Charles Gadda" <cgadda@earthlink.net>]

Yeah, while born of laziness and poor planning (I suspect, anyway), the lack
of any large scale maps did increase flexibility to a large degree!

That said, though, it would have been nice to have one larger map that did
show Elyntia, LBTM, and Underearth in their relative locations. The few
hints from the text imply that they were relatively close together.


----- Original Message -----
From: rsmith <rsmith@lightspeed.ca>
To: <tft@brainiac.com>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 1:19 PM
Subject: RE: (TFT) Gamelords


> I plopped the Elyntia map down in my Laassamma
> campaign world.  A few thousand km away, I put
> the Thorez.
>
> I never minded that they did not give maps showing
> huge continent scale areas, it made it easier to
> find a corner where I could put in the map.
>
> Rick
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tft-owner@brainiac.com [mailto:tft-owner@brainiac.com]On Behalf Of
> Peter von Kleinsmid
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 11:52 AM
> To: tft@brainiac.com
> Subject: Re: (TFT) Gamelords
>
>
> I built my enormous 7-year campaign around the Elyntia map in ITL. It
> extends the map many times in all directions. I was always curious how
many
> other players built campaigns around that ITL map. We had three other
> campaigns with the same ITL style of maps.
>
> I had LBTM and Underearth but didn't think they were very compatible with
> what I had done. I was disappointed that LBTM didn't have much
> campaign-level detail, particularly on its maps.
>
> PvK
> =====
> Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
> Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
> "unsubscribe tft"
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"