Re: (TFT) Ambiguities related to forcing retreat (for wiki)

["Todd Roseberry" <paleryder1@verizon.net>]

See below.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christopher Fuhrman" <fuhrman8or@yahoo.com>
To: "tft" <tft@brainiac.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 9:16 PM
Subject: (TFT) Ambiguities related to forcing retreat (for wiki)



> 1) what happens to the facings of either figures involved in a forced 
> retreat (attacker, attackee)?

I would think it stays the same.

> 2) what happens when more than one attacker can force a retreat on the 
> same figure?

I'm not sure how this would happend. Isn't the forced retreat done right 
away? Since there's no simultaneous actions, you shouldn't be able to have 
simultaneous forced retreats. If player 1 forces a retreat on player A, I 
suppose a subsequent player who is in contact with A could attack him and 
make him do another forced retreat. I see that the rule says that he forces 
it at the "end of the turn". This word "turn" has caused a little confusion 
in other areas. I would think it would necessarily mean after the target 
struck as well. If it means after everyone has gone, then I see the 
confusion.

Aidan
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"