Re: (TFT) Making Defending more useful - Damage after armor is 1/3...

[Rick Smith <rsmith@lightspeed.ca>]

On Mon, 2007-15-10 at 18:21 -0600, Craig W. Barber wrote:
> Hmm!!  Interesting.  Hate to Gurpify it but don't most of us prefer to believe
> that High DX figures be able to defend themselves better?  OTOH... I've always
> felt that DX was too powerful in TFT anyway.  

In Dave Seagraves TFT pbem campaign DX was used
for automatic defenses.  I took a Thief and some
handicaps to get a very high starting DX.  I had
taken NO weapon talents (I used a club).

It turns out I was more of a combat monster than 
people who were straight fighters with a medium DX.
Simply because I was not getting hit and I could 
deal out damage.

So in his campaign DX was even MORE important.
(Dave argued that DX was not the most important 
attribute in his campaign but I didn't believe it
for a minute.)

Rick
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"