[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: (TFT) Prone Rule Question
- To: tft@brainiac.com
- Subject: RE: (TFT) Prone Rule Question
- From: Sgt Hulka <hulkasgt@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=wz11DnI8XB1rRFJBu5ase7uAfd9CzMI53ksP/vfySiTFpwNvesvTwo/Q9+4R0VTvedBF/adFYz7x/BwGI9+vAb6lZDAxGfUyy8/HtdUG/KQZuzK7EB30KA3huAm7M4FNv/Tnxjl2oElk963uuNgspBDX22QwuusT3QcjRu9SFpI=;
- In-reply-to: <8A763EE5053442CFAA3D8E224330BE68@ais.columbia.edu>
- Reply-to: tft@brainiac.com
- Sender: tft-admin@brainiac.com
Here's a follow-up question...
Technically, all sides are "rear" for a prone figure. Normally that's a bad thing, right?
Well, what if the prone figure has a slung shield? Technically that should mean the slung shield protects all sides.
A hole in the rules? Or intentional?
--- On Tue, 9/30/08, Eric Coles <eac42@columbia.edu> wrote:
> From: Eric Coles <eac42@columbia.edu>
> Subject: RE: (TFT) Prone Rule Question
> To: tft@brainiac.com
> Date: Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 2:01 PM
> I've been known to allow some options on a DX roll if
> the prone figure has
> Acrobatics or some decent UC skills. For that matter, I
> have an advanced
> skill Combat Acrobatics (prereq Acrobatics and a DX level I
> can't check at
> work) that explicitly allows a number of useful options in
> situations like
> that.
>
> Best,
>
> Eric
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"