Right, OK. In a previous post I had said "this is what I thought". As the thread continued, I started summarizing my arguments made before.
Rick
On 2016-11-07, at 6:51 PM, Jeffrey Vandine wrote: Rick,
No, I got that part. It's just that you stated flat out that the underlying object issue was an error, and while that's certainly a theory, we don't actually know it for a fact, that's all.
Respectfully, Jeff
|