RE: (TFT) Justifying an aspect of combat...

[David Michael Grouchy II <david_michael_grouchy_ii@hotmail.com>]

>   > David Michael Grouchy II wrote:

>   >

>   > You have yet to make a convincing argument that

>   > something is amiss.


> From: skmpu@bhmk.com

>

> I think it's clear that Joel is addressing an issue of a perceived

> weakness of "realism" in the combat system.

   So you are interpreting for him now?  He can't speak for himself?  Is he
suddenly made of sugar and will melt under cross examination so that you have
to step in and be his champion?


1)  I think it is more than fair to ask him to actually state what he thinks
is wrong.  To define his terms.
2)  Further he should provide even one case of supporting evidence for what
ever it is he thinks needs "justification".
3)  Maybe then we should even be allowed to have the even handed opportunity
of debating  it with him.

David Michael Grouchy II



_________________________________________________________________
Get more out of the Web. Learn 10 hidden secrets of Windows Live.
http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!550
F681DAD532637!5295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_domore_092008
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"