I think you're being just a bit touchy.
I haven't attempted to enforce rules on anyone, and have mostly written
about my campaign, not yours.
Part of the reason for choosing TFT as the system for my campaign was that
I had a particular sort of world in mind, and it's one that TFT fit very
well. Change TFT, and it may no longer fit. D&D certainly didn't fit, then
or now. Nor did other systems.
The context of the rest of the game you mention seems likely to shift.
That game may not be suitable for my campaign. Which hardly matters, as I
have the original system that does.
Neil Gilmore
raito@raito.com> Different strokes for different folks.
>
> But why is it so unacceptable to allow a healing spell to be created for
> the game by the designer (which, given SJ's reputation for carefully
> thinking his way through things, will be well-balanced in the context of
> the rest of the game) and then, if you feel so strongly about denying it
> to your players, simply saying that the spell doesn't exist in your
> world? You can have it your way, and other people can have it theirs.
> Rather than "policing" how other people play, why can't we just say;
> "Okay, no big deal, it doesn't work that way in my world because mana
> can't interact with living tissue in a non-confrontational way -- it can
> blow you up, but it can't put the pieces back together again."
>
> As the GM, you can make your world any way you want, but why try to
> enforce YOUR rules on anyone else?
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to
tft@brainiac.com.Unsubscribe by mailing to
majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"