Re: (TFT) Disengaging - Revision in Melee - Not a free attack.

[Rick Smith <rick_ww@lightspeed.ca>]

Hi Gem,
  I think you are hung up on the phrase "free attack", which you have been using.

  It is not a free attack, the opponent uses his action to do it.  Additionally it is an 
attack at a DX penalty, so far from being free, it is an attack at a (potentially) 
significant penalty.  Think of it as a, "likely wasted attack".

  Warm regards, Rick.


On 2014-08-30, at 7:25 AM, gem6868 wrote:

> from the fencing lessons I had, I just don't buy into the idea that a disengage invites a "free attack".  Basically, if I can retreat faster than you can advance [whether I'm just plain faster or I fake you out] then I'm going to disengage successfully.  Especially if you're tired or intimidated.
> 
> So what I'm saying in I don't believe "disengage automatically = greater vulnerability".
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Rick Smith
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 10:49 PM
> To: tft@brainiac.com
> Subject: Re: (TFT) Disengaging - Revision in Melee
> 
> Hi Gem,
> I am not fond of your suggestion.  It would cause DX rolls anytime someone
> disengages.  Also the logic is a little suspect.  I move away from you.  I might
> get hit while I leave, but what prevents me from going?  Especially if I am a
> knight with armor and you have a wimpy little dagger.
> 
> The rules in the revised Melee only are needed in the particular circumstance
> where things are broken, so they rarely slow down the game.
> 
> Warm regards, Rick.


=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"