[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (TFT) Spear vs. Shortsword maneuvers
I think it's 75%, but I'd say it's reasonable to have it 100% with
the option to have it happen or not.
It's possible for it to happen again, too, in a real fight, since
disengagement or falling down can give the chance to charge again.
Falling could be coded in, but disengagement is sort of a judgement
call... well, actually, I guess if the pole-user has higher DX than
the non-pole-user, it makes sense for them to disengage after a
charge and hope to win initiative to get another charge in... Hmm,
actually, in 1 vs 1 combat on an open map with no helpful obstacles,
my sleepy head is thinking there's no way (other than shield rush,
HTH, or knocking him down with damage) to force a normal engagement
on a pole user who has higher DX, since he can disengage before you
attack him in a non-charge engagement. So maybe it actually becomes
100% if the pole user has higher adj DX.
At 05:34 PM 10/19/2015, David Bofinger wrote:
If someone can come up with a good estimate for the chance of a first round
charge, why not include that in the simulator? The current value of 100%
must be too high. The real value would depend on MA.
Post to the entire list by writing to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Unsubscribe by mailing to email@example.com with the message body