[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Slope: Ch 12] New Monster - Flame Fiends. Comments are welcome.



Hi Jeff,
  No this is my own rules.  (Tho on page 3 of AM, it say 
that a little girl can’t engage a knight so my rules build 
off that logic.  Why doesn’t she engage the knight?  
because if he gave her a free attack, she couldn’t hurt
him, therefore no engagement.)

  But anyways, I think that this discussion is over anyways.

  Warm regards, Rick.



On Jun 14, 2018, at 2:23 PM, Jeffrey Vandine <jlv61560@yahoo.com> wrote:

Rick, I understand your ruling and the reason for it, but it's not what TFT says about it, so my question stands; are we talking about your rules or TFT here?  Because if it's your rules, I'm totally unqualified to comment on them and will drop out of this discussion, but if it's TFT, then I can read those rules and speak from a common base.



From: Rick <rick_ww@lightspeed.ca>
To: "tft@brainiac.com" <tft@brainiac.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 4:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Slope: Ch 12] New Monster - Flame Fiends. Comments are welcome.

Hi Jeff,
  We have gone off on a tangent.  A problem with a 19 hex 
dragon is that only 7 people are needed to engage it, so 
the dragon can easily be locked in place.  I pointed out that 
with my rules, the dragon can say, “that little weeny guy 
does not engage me”, which makes them more mobile, and 
dangerous.

Warm regards, Rick

On Jun 14, 2018, at 1:21 AM, Jeffrey Vandine <jlv61560@yahoo.com> wrote:

Are we talking about your rules or TFT, here?  I thought the monster being proposed was for TFT...



From: Rick <rick_ww@lightspeed.ca>
To: "tft@brainiac.com" <tft@brainiac.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Slope: Ch 12] New Monster - Flame Fiends. Comments are welcome.

I mean that if the dragon is engaged (by say 3 people), my rules allow the dragon to say, “nope, this guy is not dangerous enough to engage me.  Prove me wrong.”


Rick


On Jun 13, 2018, at 10:32 AM, Jeffrey Vandine <jlv61560@yahoo.com> wrote:

If you read the rules, you'll note that even if the Dragon is not engaged, the little guy with the rapier is.



From: Rick <rick_ww@lightspeed.ca>
To: "tft@brainiac.com" <tft@brainiac.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 4:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Slope: Ch 12] New Monster - Flame Fiends. Comments are welcome.

True, but it can shove people back while turning.  (At 
the end of movement.)  That said, I allow dragons to 
say, “That little guy with the rapier does not engage me,” 
and ignore them.  At the cost of giving the little guy with 
a rapier a free attack in movement.

Rick


On Jun 11, 2018, at 5:48 PM, Jeffrey Vandine <jlv61560@yahoo.com> wrote:

True, but it's very HARD to engage a dragon!


From: Peter von Kleinsmid <pvk@oz.net>
To: tft@brainiac.com
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Slope: Ch 12] New Monster - Flame Fiends. Comments are welcome.

At 10:59 PM 6/9/2018, Jeffrey Vandine wrote:

Actually, the rules don't say anything of the kind.  It says, and I quote; "A giant's facing may be changed by rotating the figure in the same three hexes. A dragon's facing may only be changed by moving the dragon; he is the wrong shape to spin in place.
"

Oh wow... I wonder where I got that idea about rotating around the head hex...
Hmm, as written, it seems rather hard for a 7-hex dragon to change facing, especially if they get engaged... they can shift but no part of them can move more than one hex.