[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (TFT) A Point of Damage
Thanks for the challenge David.
My analysis of this is that Orc 1 CAN set vs. charge against Broadsword.
At the beginning of the turn in question, Orc 1 is engaged, Broadsword is
disengaged.
Now Orc 1 turns to face Broadsword.
"If a figure with a pole weapon stays in the same hex, with or without a
facing change, on the turn an enemy figure charge attacks him ..."
Broadsword, although he didn't move, went from disengaged to engaged during
the movement phase and intends to attack this round, and therefore is
counted as a "CHARGE AND ATTACK". Hence, Orc 1 can set vs. charge attack.
Did I get it right?
On another point - showing my ignorance - why did Broadsword need to
disengage in the prior round if the figure he was engaged with died before
Broadsword had his attack?
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Michael Grouchy II" <david_michael_grouchy_ii@hotmail.com>
To: "mailing list" <tft@brainiac.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 10:41 PM
Subject: RE: (TFT) A Point of Damage
Welcome Brad.
Here is a link to General Test of Melee Knowledge Number I
http://tft.brainiac.com/archive/0112/msg00073.html
from all the way back in December of 2001.
In case anyone
else hasn't
seen it.
:)
David Grouchy
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"
=====
Post to the entire list by writing to tft@brainiac.com.
Unsubscribe by mailing to majordomo@brainiac.com with the message body
"unsubscribe tft"